Of Counsel to the Cullen Law Firm:



David A. Cohen
Attorney and Counselor at Law
dac@cullenlaw.com 
 
Education:
Wayne State University, B.A. 1985, cum laude
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden, J.D., 1988,
with honors
 
Practice Areas:
 
Mr. Cohen has an extensive background in complex litigation and class actions. Over the past fifteen years he has tried over a dozen cases to verdict in state and federal courts. As an associate with the Pittsburgh office of Jones Day (1995-1999), Mr. Cohen was a member of the firm’s general litigation section and was involved in commercial litigation, product liability and employment related litigation. He also represented Fortune 500 companies such as R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and The Sherwin Williams Company in class action litigation.

Since joining the Cullen Law Firm in 2000, Mr. Cohen has represented the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc., and individual truck owner-operators, in several class action lawsuits. Mr. Cohen has been named class counsel in the following cases: Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Assoc. v. Gilbert Express, Inc., U.S. Dist. Ct., D. N.J., 00-5163; Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Assoc. v. Heartland Express of Iowa, Inc., U.S. Dist. Ct., S.D. Iowa, 01-80179; and Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Assoc.v. Ledar Transport, Inc., W.D. Mo., 00-0258.

Mr. Cohen recently tried to verdict the OOIDA v. Ledar Transport case in federal court in Kansas City. This trial was the first time the rights of owner-operators under the federal Truth-in-Leasing regulations were tried to verdict in a class action. The court found in favor of OOIDA on all counts.

Mr. Cohen also has experience in issues relating to unconstitutional “takings” under the Fifth Amendment involving railroad rights-of-way. He has represented landowners in claims against the United States arising from the conversion of abandoned railroad corridors to recreational trails under what is commonly called the “Rails-to-Trails Act.” He has been named class counsel in several cases where landowners have sued the federal government seeking compensation for property rights taken from them as a result of the imposition of a recreational trail.

Admissions